Demoed | Episode 8 | Forza 4 (BMW F10 M5 ) Corrupt Eclipse’s Series called “Demoed” ————————————————————————– Check out the ultimate car experience with Forza Motorsport 4! For More Info Visit! www.forzamotorsport.net ESRB Rating EVERYONE
Brought to you by www.CarMD.com Visit today! Examine the health of your car with CarMD. CarMD used car review and rating of the BMW 335d.
For Sale 00 (Price drop!) Yes the car comes with the video! 
Made by CarlielleEnterprises.com
For Sale 00 (Price drop!) Yes the car comes with the video! Made by CarlielleEnterprises.com
www.euroncap.comFrontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver’s door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 29km/h into a rigid pole.
IIHS news release • December 19, 2006 First crash tests of minicars: Nissan Versa earns the highest overall rating; three minicars earn poor ratings in side tests ARLINGTON, VA — For the first time, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has tested the smallest vehicles sold in the US market, which gain popularity as fuel prices rise. Now these cars are rated for comparison of occupant protection in front, side, and rear crashes. The Nissan Versa earns good ratings in all three tests. Two other cars earn good ratings in front and side but not rear tests. Full text of release at www.iihs.org
IIHS news release • June 11, 2009 Mini and microcar bumpers allow pricey damage; none of the 7 tested rates good under new system ARLINGTON, VA — Urban drivers often pick mini and microcars because they’re affordable, fuel efficient, and easy to park on city streets. Fender-benders are hazards of urban driving, and just one of them can add up to thousands of dollars in repair costs because the bumpers don’t adequately protect vehicles from damage. None of the bumpers on 7 mini and microcars the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently tested earns the top rating of good, and just 1, the Smart Fortwo, is acceptable. Five out of the 7 earn poor ratings and 1 earns a marginal. Full text of news release: www.iihs.org
IIHS news release • April 14, 2009 New crash tests demonstrate the influence of vehicle size and weight on safety in crashes; results are relevant to fuel economy policies ARLINGTON, VA — Three front-to-front crash tests, each involving a microcar or minicar into a midsize model from the same manufacturer, show how extra vehicle size and weight enhance occupant protection in collisions. These Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests are about the physics of car crashes, which dictate that very small cars generally can’t protect people in crashes as well as bigger, heavier models. Full text of release at www.iihs.org
IIHS news release • August 20, 2009 Smart Fortwo rates good for roof strength; test is designed to assess & compare occupant protection in rollover crashes ARLINGTON, VA — The Smart Fortwo has the strongest roof and the Chevrolet Aveo has the weakest among 2009 micro and minicars recently tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The Smart earns the highest rating of good compared with acceptable for the Honda Fit, Hyundai Accent, Mini Cooper, and Toyota Yaris. The Aveo is rated marginal. Full text of release at www.iihs.org
Suzuki APV 2007 with dual front airbags received a three star occupant protection rating. Test by ANCAP, February 2009. View the full crash test report here: www.mynrma.com.au
Cars Classic-Car ClassifiedsPowered by WordPress