Suzuki SX4 Review - Kelley Blue Book
FOR PRICING & SPECS ON THIS CAR VISIT: www.kbb.com Suzuki SX4. Suzukis new SX4 offers a sporty all-wheel-drive alternative to the other cars in the small hatchback class. With an athletic look and eager engine, the SX4 produces more horsepower than its competitors while still offering the economy and versatility that has always been a keynote of the hatchback sedan segment. Welcome to our comprehensive Kelley Blue Book review of the Suzuki SX4. Budget-conscious buyers will like the SX4s low …
just put the link below together (i had to separate it)) and tell me this Suzuki doesn’t have a TON of potential
Comment by JohnThomasB — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
I love this car now because of this…..
youtube. com/ watch?v=q7ZzqBPz4sY
if you can gear the Sx4 like this…. fuck yea!!
Comment by JohnThomasB — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
I own a SX4 and it is a great car. Its quick enough and the sedan w/sport package comes with Navigation and 17″ Alloys all for under 15K for the money there isnt alot of cars better. I would reccomend this car to anyone on a buget
Comment by todd240beoch — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
Please, do not compare an OVERPRICED cheap sedan car like a Yaris with an Off Road Legend like Suzuki…..This car might not be able to do the same as the Grand Vitara, but the off road capability is unique for a car of this segment and price range.
Comment by wtrdogg20 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
Who knew Suzuki was still alive
Comment by Lavalae — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
yup, the front A-Pillars REALLY hinders visibility, especially at night while turning, I’m always worry I’m going to hit a pedestrian crossing. BUT apparently, this A-Pillar ADDS tremendous rigidity to the frame. It makes it an VERY good and capable WRC car, and the weight distribution too is 50% rear-front, where normal cars are more like 60% front.
Comment by boxerboy999 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
Do not be fooled–This may be a cheap car –But it is very thirsty and isn’t good on gas especially in town or city driving.Looks good enough .I had a test drive and there are serious blind spots for the driver.
Comment by whiskeyindejar — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
this car dosnt have a sporty look like the narrator says and well i think it looks cheep. the only suzuki i want is the grand vitara. this car is bland like old hyundais
Comment by gvermonter — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
i think it is uggggggly
Comment by gvermonter — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
I actually like the exterior and interior styling of the SX4 hatchback given the affordable price. But this car is underpowered during my test drive. This is the only reason I would pass on the SX4.
Comment by davidhalifax — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
The SX4 is awesome in the worst snow and ice. Makes it disappear. Great car for Colorado, where I live. I just bought one before our first big ice storm and it drove circles around 2WD cars. Handles like a go cart and loves to rev! I’ve had Hondas to Hyundais and this SX4 is quality. Luv it!
Comment by Ndorfin96 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
the Fit doesn’t have a timing chain, nor a DOHC engine, nor rear disc brakes, OR everyone would like a Fit.
Comment by 090f101 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
ageed
Comment by kevcrave — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
i have a sx4 but used to have a fit, i stuffed 7 adults in it LoL, but took 5 full adults in a 300 mile trip…. nothing that the sx4 can do better
Comment by wolfe787 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
You’re right about the engine. The Honda Fit is underpowered.
Looks… It’s a ‘hate it or love it’.
No Space? WTF?? O_o
I own one and it has 57 CUBIC FT of cargo space with the rear seats folded flat.
That’s even more space than most compact/midsize SUVs!!
Comment by occultdestroyer — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
MMmm better engine???? Ur wrong. I love honda too because of its security and everything but honestly the honda fit looks like a toy, no engine, space???? it has no space, max 4 people.
Comment by Blessing92 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
But It’s slower, more girly, and does not offer AWD. There are pro’s and con’s for each.
Comment by p90muscle — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
I still prefer the Honda Fit.
Roomier, more spacious, better engine, better interior quality, and higher resale value.
Comment by occultdestroyer — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
I meant the Swift ‘+’, but the specification was unneeded as we were talking about NSA cars.
I know the Sedici is the SX4. However, the SX4 is built on a new chassis. The Swift chassis didn’t have space for the AWD system (half shafts etc). The frame is similar to the Swift’s, but there are enough changes from the initial stages of development for it to be considered a new chassis.
Comment by ANM4x4 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
As far as the “Joint Venture” between Suzuki and Fiat…. the ONLY thing Fiat had to do with the car is fitting a Fiat diesel engine in it, for sale as a Sedici. Other than that, Fiat had nothing to do with the design or engineering of the SX4.
Comment by JetBlueIce — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
Nope: You mean the Suzuki Swift+ not the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift+ is sold in Canada, and that is not a Suzuki at all, that is a Daewoo, as also the Aveo is a Daewoo.
The REAL Suzuki Swift has nothing to do with Aveo, it is ALL Suzuki designed engineered and built.
The Suzuki SX4 is based off of the Suzuki Swift Global Platform. SX4 is a “stretched swift”.
The Fiat Sedici is merely a rebadged SX4, even the Sedici is built by Suzuki in the Suzuki factory in Hungary.
Comment by JetBlueIce — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
only thing that bothers me bout this car is the side front windows. they extend past the rear view mirrors, making it look funny. but thats just me.
americas least expensive AWD car
Comment by GrahamCrackers94 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
nice car but i prefer the more fuel efficient fit n yaris
Comment by KPKonliner — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
dont b fooled by its ground clearance ! even Yaris can do da same off road as SX4
Comment by KPKonliner — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am
I had this car as a rental, definately a surprise hit. I don’t even like small cars, but I have to appreciate this car for what it is. Great peppy engine and strong brakes with a nice interior. I’d easily pick this over the current Lancer that I’ve driven also.
Comment by AdamAus85 — December 28, 2009 @ 6:36 am