Cars Classic-Car Classifieds

September 25, 2009

MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z

Filed under: Nissan — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 2:25 am

MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z

25 Comments »

  1. yea when u love Z’s and ur 6′6 it could hurt ur heart to get in a 370z and relize u dont fit well

    Comment by hoodyman88 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  2. NISMO, NISSAN, INFINITI FTW!!

    Comment by bryanchou — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  3. Me too! But this piece of technology is long over due. And thankfully, there’s an on/off button for it.

    Comment by RdGr12 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  4. Damn Synchro-Rev match.

    For people too lazy to heel-toe? For people not talented enough?

    Personally, I like doing it myself.

    Comment by ShortySIG552 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  5. Lotus!

    Comment by ShortySIG552 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  6. It’s so annoying how the guy ad-libs on the segments. At the end he was like; ” Ama-Zzz-ing. What a dork.

    Comment by Coffeeholic82 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  7. I see a cartoon face from the front, same as the updated RX-8. What gives Japan? Please stop giving your great sports cars anime faces. If Toyota comes out with a goofy smiling Supra I’m going to be pissed.

    Comment by dtobin123 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  8. I agree at first when I saw the new Z I thought it was Bad ass .But that was just the excitement of seeing a new z. but Now that that died down. I too like it less and less. Any way if your looking for a sports coupe you should check out the 08 bmw z4 M coupe. From the fenders back it looks sexy as hell.

    Comment by brownmokey — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  9. Great machine. Looks good. Is good!

    Comment by nicknickk — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  10. Lighter, shorter, lower and more power? Recipe for progress. I hate how cars always seem to become larger and heavier with each new generation. Sports especially need to avoid this.

    Comment by n0c0n — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  11. Sorry I meant the Porsche Cayenne. That’s also a weird car.

    Comment by Coffeeholic82 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  12. your entitled to whatever opinion you like but it looks nothing like a crossfire

    Comment by SorthNarolina — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  13. somewhat settle???………….LOL

    Comment by moderndesignworks — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  14. I’m sorry but the 370Z is ugly as hell. It looks a lot like the Chrysler Crossfire., which is also ugly. Why is Nissan building ugly cars? Their cars used to look cool, but now they just hideous.

    Comment by Coffeeholic82 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  15. My local Nissan dealer had a sexy red 370Z on the showroom floor. I had never seen one up close, so I really looked it over and sat in it. I was tremendously dissapointed. The interior is definitely a step up in style and quality from the 350z, but the ergonomics were terrible and I felt so shoehorned in the car. I’m 5′9 160lbs and the seat felt incredibly narrow, to a very uncomfortable degree. I wasn’t impressed. I can’t see driving this car everyday like some do.

    Comment by palebeachbum — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  16. This car definitely gives porsche a run for it’s money. I love the 993’s but now I’d consider this car for sure. this car is cheaper to own, just as quick if not quicker, and looks great.

    Comment by 2005MZ3 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  17. The best comparo I can think of is the 80’s Vette. It was a slab of unfinished-looking blah. The revamped Vette with it’s sculptured lines is a more complete, and beautiful looking piece of machinery.

    Comment by hellboy1976 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  18. The 350 was an unfinished, and in many places, uninspired piece of work (classy is one word I WOULDN’T use to describe the car). In every way possible the 370 looks not only finished, but much better as well. It’s beautiful from all sides.
    The interior on the 350 is garbage and I’m thrilled Nissan has taken steps to address it.

    Comment by hellboy1976 — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  19. To each his/her own. IMO, the 350Z is a contrived bar of soap. I’ll take the sharper handling, sharper looking, and more powerful 370Z over the last gen.

    Comment by Clodrock — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  20. No, not in my case. I think the 370z’s styling is less mature than the 350z, and the interior is way overdone. The interior of the 350z feels more in line with the Z-car heritage in my opinion (I have a 350z, had a 300zx, and my uncle has a 260z). The interior isn’t awful on the 370z, it’s just way too contrived. The exterior is less classy and more juvenile.

    Comment by hartsickdisciple — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  21. 13.7 1/4 mile?? Something wrong there, I’ve seen tests where they got a slightly slower 0-60 but a 13.5 1/4 mile. The quickest test I’ve seen is 0-60 in 4.7 and a 13.3 1/4 mile which makes sense considering the power and low weight this car has. Does anyone know what the 0-60 times of the 7 speed version is?

    Comment by gorgnaga — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  22. LOL a-may-ZZing… LOL LOL

    Comment by khunopie — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  23. Motorweek runs every car they test slower than other auto mags. don’t know where and who’s testing these cars

    Comment by lost300z — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  24. beautiful car ,i like it . when it offers for chinese i will purchase at least 2 . haha !

    Comment by 2005china — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  25. I really like this car’s looks but I never liked Nissans before. This car will make current 350Z owners either very envious, jealous, or will make them trade up to a 370Z.

    Comment by Clodrock — September 25, 2009 @ 2:25 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Please insert the signs in the image:


Reload Image Play Audio-CAPTCHA

Powered by WordPress